One complete template can travel across many laboratories and people.

Purpose

Coordinate a rigorous multi-hub project with explicit ownership, contribution evidence, decision history, and publication gates.

Stages

1. Question and audience
2. Evidence landscape
3. Readiness and permissions
4. Protocol and methods
5. Data and analysis
6. Interpretation
7. Writing
8. Internal review
9. Submission and revision
10. Public record and learning return

Deliverables

• Project charter
• Responsibility matrix
• Protocol or analysis plan
• Evidence map
• Decision record
• Contribution ledger
• Claims matrix
• Manuscript package
• Dissemination record
• Preservation summary

Readiness requirements

• Named project lead and local stewards
• Data ownership and access established
• Institutional and ethics requirements resolved
• Authorship process acknowledged
• Secure working pathway identified
• Review and release authority recorded

Purpose

Turn a defined question into a traceable evidence landscape with transparent search, selection, extraction, synthesis, and interpretation.

Stages

1. Review question
2. Protocol
3. Search strategy
4. Screening
5. Extraction
6. Quality appraisal
7. Synthesis
8. Interpretation
9. Writing and release

Deliverables

• Review protocol
• Search record
• Eligibility guide
• Screening log
• Extraction form
• Evidence table
• Quality assessment
• Synthesis memo
• Manuscript or public brief

Readiness requirements

• Question and review type selected
• Database access confirmed
• Reviewer roles assigned
• Duplicate-screening plan recorded
• Citation management pathway selected
• Publication venue considered

Purpose

Coordinate a cross-hub analytic project while keeping data authority, definitions, transformations, limitations, and release decisions explicit.

Stages

1. Question and cohort
2. Data inventory
3. Permissions
4. Data dictionary
5. Analysis plan
6. Quality checks
7. Analysis
8. Interpretation
9. Claims review
10. Release

Deliverables

• Data inventory
• Permission record
• Cohort definition
• Data dictionary
• Analysis plan
• Code and version record
• Quality report
• Results tables
• Claims matrix
• Manuscript package

Readiness requirements

• Data controller identified
• Approved access pathway
• Privacy and de-identification review
• Outcome and denominator definitions
• Analysis environment approved
• Local authority for release documented

Purpose

Create a shared quality language across hubs before analyses, models, manuscripts, or operational decisions rely on the data.

Stages

1. Intended use
2. Source map
3. Field definitions
4. Quality rules
5. Validation sample
6. Issue classification
7. Remediation
8. Fitness decision

Deliverables

• Source and lineage map
• Data dictionary
• Quality rule set
• Validation report
• Issue register
• Remediation record
• Fitness-for-use decision

Readiness requirements

• Authorized access
• Named data steward
• Purpose and risk level defined
• Reference standard identified
• Privacy controls active
• Decision owner named

Purpose

Test a focused innovation with clear users, assumptions, safeguards, evidence thresholds, and a decision about continuation.

Stages

1. Need and user
2. Current process
3. Pilot hypothesis
4. Safety and governance
5. Prototype or workflow
6. Feasibility test
7. Learning review
8. Decision

Deliverables

• Pilot charter
• User and workflow map
• Risk register
• Test plan
• Evidence capture form
• Feasibility summary
• Decision memo
• Next-phase recommendation

Readiness requirements

• Pilot boundary defined
• User and stakeholder roles identified
• Privacy and safety review complete
• Success measures recorded
• Stop criteria recorded
• Decision owner named

Purpose

Move a manuscript through accountable writing, claims review, author review, revision, submission, and preservation.

Stages

1. Manuscript diagnosis
2. Audience and venue
3. Contribution confirmation
4. Outline and claims
5. Draft integration
6. Internal review
7. Author review
8. Submission or revision response

Deliverables

• Manuscript brief
• Author and contributor record
• Claims matrix
• Integrated draft
• Internal review log
• Author decisions
• Response-to-reviewers matrix
• Submission record

Readiness requirements

• Manuscript owner named
• Source files controlled
• Contributions documented
• Data and figure provenance available
• Author review pathway established
• Target venue requirements available

Purpose

Carry evidence into public use while preserving context, uncertainty, accessibility, permissions, and audience dignity.

Stages

1. Audience and need
2. Evidence boundary
3. Message map
4. Format selection
5. Draft or prototype
6. Accessibility review
7. Stakeholder review
8. Release and learning

Deliverables

• Audience brief
• Evidence and claims map
• Plain-language draft
• Accessibility review
• Stakeholder feedback record
• Final resource
• Release log
• Learning summary

Readiness requirements

• Audience partner identified
• Claims approved for translation
• Permissions and attribution clear
• Accessibility needs considered
• Feedback pathway defined
• Release owner named

Purpose

Coordinate educational creation across hubs through shared objectives, source review, learner testing, accessibility, and version stewardship.

Stages

1. Learner and purpose
2. Objectives
3. Evidence and source review
4. Learning design
5. Resource production
6. Assessment
7. Learner review
8. Revision and release

Deliverables

• Learning brief
• Objectives map
• Source register
• Complete learning resource
• Assessment and scoring guide
• Accessibility review
• Pilot feedback
• Facilitator guidance
• Version record

Readiness requirements

• Learner group defined
• Subject-matter reviewer named
• Rights and source use cleared
• Assessment purpose defined
• Accessibility pathway selected
• Release and update owner named