Course review and preparation
Research fundamentals checklists
Review the research fundamentals curriculum and prepare for the original knowledge-check activities.
Detailed curriculum checklist
Open the complete original CSV
| Checklist Item |
|---|
| Research Fundamentals: Thriving in an Innovation Research Lab |
| This syllabus serves as a foundational roadmap for this course, outlining the goals, structure, and expectations. In this curriculum, the syllabus serves several purposes: |
| 1. Setting the Vision and Purpose |
| Provides a clear understanding of the course’s goals, such as fostering innovation, developing essential lab skills, and cultivating a research mindset. |
| Emphasizes the importance of thriving in collaborative, fast-paced, and creative research environments. |
| 2. Clarifying Learning Objectives |
| Defines specific knowledge and skills learners will acquire, such as formulating hypotheses, designing experiments, analyzing data, and communicating results effectively. |
| Highlights competencies critical for innovation, including problem-solving, critical thinking, and teamwork. |
| 3. Outlining the Framework |
| Details the course structure, including key topics like the scientific method, innovation strategies, lab safety, ethics, and data management. |
| Maps out the progression from foundational concepts to advanced, hands-on research activities. |
| 4. Establishing Expectations |
| Communicates what is required for success, including participation, collaboration, assignments, and assessments. |
| Sets standards for professionalism, intellectual curiosity, and adaptability in research settings. |
| 5. Inspiring Engagement |
| Encourages learners to approach the curriculum with enthusiasm and a growth mindset. |
| Highlights opportunities for creativity and innovation within the lab, fostering a culture of discovery and continuous learning. |
| 6. Guiding Professional and Academic Growth |
| Introduces learners to the tools and techniques essential for conducting impactful research. |
| Connects lab research fundamentals to broader career development in scientific innovation and inquiry. |
| By serving as both a guide and an inspiration, the syllabus helps learners navigate the complex world of research with confidence and purpose, preparing you to contribute meaningfully to your fields. |
| Research Fundamentals: Thriving in an Innovation Research Lab |
| This curriculum is designed to equip trainees with the necessary skills to succeed in a virtual innovation research lab. Since the lab is virtual and does not meet in person, the curriculum emphasizes communication, collaboration, remote tools, self-management, and problem-solving in a digital environment. The goal is to foster independent and team-based research skills, ensuring that trainees can thrive in a remote, innovative research setting. |
| Goal: Equip trainees with the skills, knowledge, and mindset needed to excel in a research lab focused on innovation. |
| Outcome: Trainees complete the program with foundational skills, practical experience, and the confidence to contribute meaningfully to innovative research. |
| Structure: Modules, Essays, Checklist, Videos, and Knowledge Check Quiz |
| To cover the following topics, please review the lab’s mission, vision, and ongoing projects, by watching all of the previous and subsequent videos on the Research Fundamentals webpage. |
| Topics: Purpose of innovation in research, lab structure, roles and responsibilities. |
| Scientific Method and Research Design |
| Topics: Key principles of conducting methodical and innovative research. |
| Lab Etiquette and Best Practices |
| Topics: How to maintain safety, organization, and professionalism in the lab. |
| To cover the following topics, please review the lab’s mission, vision, and ongoing projects, by watching all of the previous and subsequent videos on the Research Fundamentals webpage. |
| Critical Thinking and Problem Solving |
| Topics: Identifying gaps in research, thinking outside the box, creative approaches to challenges. |
| Please read this article: “Teaching Critical Thinking in Science” |
| Please read this article: “Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Scientific Reasoning” |
| Collaborative Research Skills |
| Topics: Team dynamics, effective communication, and interdisciplinary collaboration |
| Please read this article: “Creating and Maintaining High-Performing Collaborative Research Teams” |
| To cover the following topics, please review the articles provided at the links below. |
| Topics: How to protect innovative ideas, patents, copyrights, ethics in research. |
| Please read this article: “Protecting Intellectual Property, Data, and Research Materials” |
| Research and Iteration |
| Topics: Designing and refining experiments, learning from failure, iteration strategies. |
| Please read this article: “Building Resilience in Scientific Research & Academia” |
| Data Analysis and Visualization |
| Topics: Statistical analysis, interpreting results, presenting findings effectively & visually. |
| Please read this article: “Why Is Data Visualization Important?” |
| To cover the following topics, please review the articles provided at the links below. |
| Staying Updated with the Field |
| Topics: Strategies for staying current on literature and emerging trends. |
| Please read this article: “How to Keep Up with the Scientific Literature” |
| Resilience and Adaptability |
| Topics: Overcoming setbacks, embracing ambiguity, and fostering a growth mindset. |
| Please read this article: “Resilience, an Evolving Concept: A Review of Literature Relevant to the Health of the Military Service Member” |
| Presentation and Communication Skills |
| Topics: Sharing research findings with technical and non-technical audiences. |
| Please read this article: “Essential Skills to Present Your Research” |
| Please review the following essays, checklist, and videos to prepare you to begin lab projects and integration in the lab. |
| Essay 1 |
| The Journey of Research: From Vision to Impact |
| Essay 2 |
| Comprehensive Guide to Designing and Conducting a Research Study: From Conception to Publication |
| Essay 3 |
| Assessing Manuscript Readiness for Submission to a Medical or Scientific Journal |
| Checklist |
| Manuscript Readiness Checklist for Medical and Scientific Journal Submission |
| Integration into the Lab Community |
| Please continue formal onboarding in the lab, and integration into ongoing lab projects. |
| Essay 1 - The Journey of Research: From Vision to Impact |
| Embarking on a research study is a challenging yet profoundly rewarding journey. It requires meticulous planning, intellectual curiosity, and an unwavering commitment to advancing knowledge and improving outcomes. This essay outlines the step-by-step process of conducting research, discusses the obstacles you might face, and emphasizes the skills and collaborations needed to make your research impactful. |
| 1. Envisioning the Research Study |
| Every great study starts with a vision. Begin by identifying a gap in knowledge or an unanswered question in your field. Consider problems that excite your curiosity and have the potential to make a meaningful difference. Envision how your research can contribute to the scientific community and ultimately improve lives. Think big but start with a clear, specific focus. |
| 2. Formulating the Right Research Questions |
| Your research question is the cornerstone of your study. It should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). Start with broad brainstorming, then refine your question by asking yourself: |
| What is the problem I’m trying to solve? |
| Why does this matter? |
| Who will benefit from this research? |
| A good research question should guide the study’s design and methods. |
| 3. Defining the Study Population |
| Choosing the right population is crucial. Consider: |
| Inclusion criteria: Who should be included? |
| Exclusion criteria: Who should be excluded? |
| Sample size: How many participants are needed to ensure statistically significant results? |
| Aim for a population that represents the broader group you’re studying, but ensure it aligns with your resources and study goals. |
| 4. Planning Data Collection |
| Determine where and how to collect your data. Will it be through surveys, interviews, clinical measurements, or existing datasets? Ensure your methods are robust, valid, and reliable. Plan how you’ll store, manage, and protect the data. |
| Best Practices for Data Collection: |
| Develop clear protocols and standard operating procedures. |
| Train your team thoroughly to ensure consistency. |
| Use validated tools and instruments. |
| Pilot-test your methods before full implementation. |
| Maintain meticulous records. |
| 5. Ethics, Regulation, and IRB Approval |
| Research must prioritize ethical principles, including respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Submitting your study for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is essential to ensure ethical compliance. Your IRB application should clearly outline: |
| Study purpose and methods. |
| Recruitment strategies. |
| Potential risks and benefits to participants. |
| Informed consent process. |
| Prepare for iterative revisions based on IRB feedback, as their goal is to protect participants while ensuring your study’s integrity. |
| 6. Challenges in Conducting Research |
| Research is fraught with challenges, including: |
| Recruitment difficulties. |
| Budget constraints. |
| Time pressures. |
| Managing unexpected events (e.g., participant dropouts, equipment failures). |
| Flexibility and problem-solving skills are critical for navigating these hurdles. |
| 7. The Importance of Interdisciplinary Teams and Collaboration |
| No researcher is an island. Collaboration with interdisciplinary teams enriches your study by incorporating diverse perspectives and expertise. Whether it’s statisticians, clinicians, or social scientists, each team member brings unique insights that can enhance the study’s quality and impact. |
| 8. Challenges in Data Collection and Analysis |
| Obtaining enough complete, high-quality data is a common challenge. Missing or incomplete data can undermine your findings. To address this: |
| Use strategies to minimize participant burden and ensure compliance. |
| Implement real-time quality checks during data collection. |
| Statistical analysis can also be daunting. To succeed: |
| Start training early in statistical methods and software. |
| Take courses, attend workshops, and practice regularly. |
| Collaborate with experienced statisticians or data analysts. |
| Self-directed learning is essential. Read textbooks, watch tutorials, and discuss your progress with your research group. |
| 9. Interpreting Data in a Clinical Context |
| Data analysis is only the beginning. Interpreting results in a clinical context is critical for ensuring their relevance and impact. Ask yourself: |
| What do these results mean for real-world practice? |
| How can this knowledge improve patient care or inform policy? |
| Collaborate with clinicians and experts to contextualize your findings effectively. |
| 10. Disseminating Research: Abstracts and Manuscripts |
| After interpreting your data, the next step is sharing your findings. |
| Writing an Abstract: Craft a concise summary highlighting the study’s purpose, methods, results, and significance. Tailor it to the target audience of conferences and society meetings. |
| Presenting Your Work: Prepare an engaging oral or poster presentation to share your findings and gain feedback. |
| Writing a Manuscript: A full manuscript delves deeper into your work. Structure it with clear sections: introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Highlight your study’s impact and relevance. |
| 11. The Publication Journey |
| The publication process can be painstaking. Manuscripts are often rejected multiple times before acceptance. Use each rejection as an opportunity to refine your work. Peer feedback helps polish your manuscript, ensuring it’s as impactful as possible when published. |
| 12. The Ultimate Goal: Moving the Field Forward |
| Remember, research is not just about data. It’s about advancing knowledge, transforming practice, and improving lives. Every step—from envisioning the study to publication—contributes to a larger purpose: creating a better future for patients and society. |
| Be Inspired to Learn and Contribute |
| Research is a lifelong journey of learning and growing. Start building your skills now—read, study, and engage with your peers. Practice statistical analysis and seek feedback. And most importantly, stay curious, resilient, and committed to making a difference. |
| Your work can change lives. It can inspire others. And it will be part of the collective effort to advance science and improve the human condition. Keep moving forward—you’re building the future. |
| Essay 2 - Comprehensive Guide to Designing and Conducting a Research Study: From Conception to Publication |
| Research is a journey that requires vision, perseverance, collaboration, and resilience. This guide outlines the essential steps and considerations to take your study from an idea to impactful publication. |
| 1. Envisioning the Research Study |
| Identify a Gap or Need: What is unknown or unresolved in your field? Engage with the literature to understand current challenges. |
| Define Your Purpose: What impact will your study have on science, healthcare, or society? |
| 2. Asking the Right Questions |
| Formulate a primary research question that is specific, measurable, and answerable within your constraints (time, budget, resources). |
| Develop secondary questions to explore additional nuances. Use frameworks like PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) to guide this process. |
| 3. Determining the Study Population |
| Decide who or what you will study: patients, animals, systems, or datasets. |
| Ensure the population aligns with your research question and will provide reliable insights. |
| Address diversity and inclusion to improve the generalizability of your findings. |
| 4. Determining Where and How to Collect Data |
| Where: Hospitals, clinics, public databases, community settings, or laboratory environments. |
| How: Use methods that match your study goals—quantitative (surveys, lab tests, imaging) or qualitative (interviews, focus groups). |
| 5. Data Collection Best Practices |
| Pilot your data collection tools (surveys, equipment) to troubleshoot errors. |
| Standardize procedures to ensure consistency. |
| Train your team on ethical and technical aspects of data handling. |
| Monitor and document the data collection process meticulously. |
| 6. Ethics and Regulations |
| Protect participants by prioritizing privacy, safety, and informed consent. |
| Apply to your institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) for approval: |
| Submit a clear protocol detailing objectives, methods, and ethical safeguards. |
| Anticipate and address reviewers’ concerns. |
| Stay updated on laws like HIPAA (for patient data) and ensure compliance. |
| 7. Challenges During Research |
| Recruitment issues: Incentivize participation ethically and address barriers like accessibility or mistrust. |
| Resource limitations: Budget cuts, equipment failures, or time constraints may arise. |
| Unforeseen biases: Regularly reassess your study to minimize bias. |
| 8. Importance of Interdisciplinary Teams |
| Collaborate with statisticians, clinicians, community representatives, and experts in related fields. |
| Diverse perspectives enrich your study design and analysis. |
| Build a team culture of open communication and shared goals. |
| 9. Obtaining and Analyzing Data |
| Ensure your data is complete, accurate, and appropriately labeled. |
| Address missing data proactively, using imputation or other statistical techniques. |
| Learn statistical software and techniques yourself (e.g., R, SPSS, SAS). |
| Start training early: Take courses, watch tutorials, and practice on sample datasets. |
| Engage with your virtual research group to discuss challenges and exchange insights. |
| 10. Interpreting Data in a Clinical Context |
| Focus on clinical or practical relevance: |
| Is the result statistically significant? Clinically significant? Both? |
| How does this apply to patient care or policy? |
| Avoid overstating findings; acknowledge limitations. |
| 11. Writing an Abstract and Presenting Your Work |
| Abstract: Write a concise summary of your study, highlighting objectives, methods, key results, and implications. |
| Presentations: Tailor your talk to your audience. Use visuals and clear messaging to communicate effectively. |
| Submit your abstract to conferences or summits relevant to your field. |
| 12. Writing and Publishing a Manuscript |
| Structure: |
| Methods: Explain how you conducted the study in detail. |
| Results: Present data clearly and objectively. |
| Discussion: Interpret findings, relate them to existing literature, and suggest future directions. |
| Conclusion: Summarize the impact of your work. |
| Writing Tips: |
| Write clearly, logically, and succinctly. |
| Review journal guidelines and tailor your manuscript to their audience. |
| Submit and Prepare for Rejection: |
| Rejections are normal and part of the process. Use reviewer feedback to strengthen your work. |
| Revise, resubmit, and persist. |
| 13. Moving the Field Forward |
| Publishing is just the beginning. Your research: |
| Educates others in the field. |
| Informs clinical practice and policy. |
| Inspires future studies and innovations. |
| Be resilient, realistic, and passionate. Research has its frustrations, but the potential to create meaningful impact makes every step worthwhile. |
| Essay 3 - Assessing Manuscript Readiness for Submission to a Medical or Scientific Journal |
| Submitting a manuscript to a medical or scientific journal requires meticulous preparation and thorough review to ensure adherence to journal standards. Below is a step-by-step guide to assessing the readiness of each section of your manuscript for submission. |
| Title Page |
| The title page is the first impression of your manuscript and must include the following details: |
| 1. Title: Ensure the title is concise, descriptive, and reflective of the study’s focus. Avoid jargon or abbreviations. |
| 2. Authors and Affiliations: List all authors, their full names, and affiliations, including department, institution, city, and country. |
| 3. Corresponding Author: Clearly identify the corresponding author with contact details (email and phone number). |
| 4. Word Count: Include the word count for the abstract and the main text (excluding references, tables, and figures). |
| 5. Running Title: Provide a short title or “running head” (typically under 50 characters) for use in page headers. |
| 6. Keywords: List 3–6 keywords below the title or on the abstract page. These should be relevant to the study and help in indexing. |
| 7. Acknowledgment of Funding and Disclosures: Briefly acknowledge funding sources and disclose conflicts of interest, if applicable (details can also be provided in a separate section after the discussion). |
| Abstract Page |
| The abstract is a standalone summary of the study. Check for the following: |
| 1. Structure: Ensure the abstract adheres to the journal’s requirements (structured or unstructured). For structured abstracts, use headings such as Background, Methods, Results, and Conclusions. |
| 2. Content: Summarize the study’s objectives, methods, key results, and main conclusions. Avoid abbreviations or references. |
| 3. Word Limit: Verify the word count meets the journal’s limit (typically 150–300 words). |
| 4. Keywords: Repeat or list the keywords below the abstract if not included on the title page. |
| The introduction must provide a clear context for the study. Assess the following: |
| 1. Paragraph 1: Clearly state the research question being addressed. |
| 2. Paragraph 2: Provide robust background information with references to relevant literature in the field. |
| 3. Paragraph 3: Identify specific knowledge gaps in the literature that the study addresses. |
| 4. Paragraph 4: Explain how the study addresses the knowledge gaps, including the hypothesis and how it was investigated. Ensure this flows logically from the preceding paragraphs. |
| Methods |
| The methods section must be detailed and reproducible. Verify the following: |
| 1. Study Population: Describe the population, including inclusion and exclusion criteria. |
| 2. Study Design: Clearly describe the study design, ensuring consistency with Figure 1 (flow diagram). |
| 3. Data Collection and Storage: Provide details on how data were collected and stored, including tools and protocols. |
| 4. Ethics and Approvals: State that the study received IRB approval and outline the informed consent process. |
| 5. Statistical Analysis: Clearly describe the statistical methods, including: |
| Primary and secondary endpoints. |
| Presentation of data (e.g., mean ± SD, percentages, etc.). |
| Significance thresholds (e.g., P-values) and justification for their use. |
| 6. Tools and Questionnaires: Include details about any questionnaires or tools used to collect data. |
| Results |
| The results section should present findings in a clear and logical sequence. Check the following: |
| 1. Baseline Characteristics: Begin with a description of the demographics and baseline characteristics of the study population (Table 1). |
| 2. Alignment with Methods: Ensure the results align with the methods described and address the hypothesis outlined in the introduction. |
| 3. Figures and Tables: Refer to Figure 1 and other tables or figures as needed. Verify that all are cited in the text in the correct order. |
| Discussion |
| The discussion interprets the results and places them in the context of the broader field. Ensure the following: |
| 1. Paragraph 1: Summarize the key findings presented in the results. |
| 2. Subsequent Paragraphs: Highlight key results and discuss their significance in relation to existing literature. |
| 3. Strengths and Limitations: Acknowledge study strengths and address limitations with compensatory points to justify the study’s value. |
| 4. Conclusion: End with a forward-looking conclusion that outlines implications and future directions. |
| Additional Sections |
| 1. Financial Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest: Include declarations of funding sources and potential conflicts of interest. |
| 2. Acknowledgments: Acknowledge contributors, institutions, and any assistance received during the study. |
| References |
| 1. Ensure all references are inserted using EndNote or another reference manager. |
| 2. List references in the required format and sequence after the main text. |
| Order of Remaining Components |
| After the discussion and disclosures: |
| 1. References |
| 2. Tables |
| 3. Figures |
| 4. Supplemental Materials |
| Final Checklist |
| Review journal-specific formatting and submission guidelines. |
| Conduct a grammar and style check. |
| Confirm all sections are consistent and free of contradictions. |
| Verify all required components are included. |
| By following this guide, you can ensure that your manuscript is thorough, well-organized, and ready for submission. |
| Manuscript Readiness Checklist for Medical and Scientific Journal Submission |
| This instructional guide will walk you through the essential steps to assess the readiness of your manuscript for submission to a medical or scientific journal. Follow these instructions to ensure that each section meets the required standards and guidelines. |
| Title Page |
| The title page should include the following elements: |
| 1. Title: Clear, concise, and descriptive. Reflect the main focus of the study. |
| 2. Author Information: Include the full name, academic degrees, institutional affiliations, and email addresses for all authors. Indicate the corresponding author. |
| 3. Running Title: A short version of the title (usually 50 characters or less). |
| 4. Keywords: List 3-10 keywords that reflect the content of the manuscript. These can be listed either on the title page or below the abstract on the abstract page. |
| 5. Acknowledgments: Brief mention of contributors, funding sources, and support received for the study. |
| 6. Conflicts of Interest Disclosure: State any potential conflicts of interest for all authors. |
| 7. Word Count: Include word counts for the abstract and main text. |
| 8. Figures and Tables: Note the number of figures, tables, and supplemental materials included in the manuscript. |
| Abstract Page |
| The abstract should summarize the study succinctly and be structured as follows: |
| 1. Background: Provide context and state the research question. |
| 2. Methods: Briefly describe the study design, population, and key methodologies. |
| 3. Results: Highlight the main findings with quantitative data where appropriate. |
| 4. Conclusion: Summarize the implications of the findings. |
| 5. Keywords: List 3-10 keywords below the abstract (if not already on the title page). |
| 6. Formatting: Follow the journal’s specific structure (structured or unstructured abstract) and word count limits. |
| The introduction should clearly set up the study and follow this structure: |
| 1. Paragraph 1: State the research question clearly and concisely. |
| 2. Paragraph 2: Provide robust background information based on a thorough review of the relevant literature. |
| 3. Paragraph 3: Identify specific knowledge gaps in the field that your study will address. |
| 4. Paragraph 4: Describe how your study addresses the identified gaps. Include the hypothesis and how it was investigated. |
| Methods |
| Ensure that the methods section is thorough and consistent with the study design (referencing Figure 1, if applicable): |
| 1. Study Population: Define the population, including inclusion and exclusion criteria. |
| 2. Study Design: Describe the design in detail and ensure consistency with Figure 1. |
| 3. Data Collection: Explain how data were collected, stored, and managed. |
| 4. Ethics: Mention IRB approval and informed consent procedures. |
| 5. Statistical Analysis: Include: |
| Metrics and units used for data presentation. |
| Description of primary and secondary endpoints. |
| Statistical methods and P-value thresholds for significance (explain why thresholds were chosen). |
| 6. Tools: Provide details on any questionnaires, software, or equipment used. |
| Results |
| The results section should align with the methods and flow logically: |
| 1. Baseline Characteristics: Start by describing the demographics and baseline characteristics of the study population (Table 1). |
| 2. Hypothesis Testing: Present findings in the context of the hypothesis stated in the introduction. |
| 3. Figures and Tables: Reference Figure 1 (study design) and other visuals as needed. |
| 4. Consistency: Ensure the results flow consistently with the study design and methodology. |
| Discussion |
| The discussion should contextualize the results and emphasize their significance: |
| 1. Paragraph 1: Summarize the key findings. |
| 2. Subsequent Paragraphs: Focus on individual highlights from the results, discussing them in the context of existing literature. |
| 3. Strengths and Limitations: |
| Address study limitations and provide compensatory points. |
| Emphasize strengths that make the study valuable. |
| 4. Conclusion: Summarize the study and suggest future directions. |
| Additional Sections |
| Following the discussion, include: |
| 1. Financial Disclosures: State any funding sources or financial relationships. |
| 2. Conflicts of Interest: Disclose any conflicts for all authors. |
| 3. Acknowledgments: Recognize contributors and supporters. |
| References |
| Ensure references are inserted via EndNote or a similar reference manager. |
| Format them according to the journal’s style guidelines. |
| Figures, Tables, and Supplemental Materials |
| Organize these sections in the following order: |
| 1. Tables |
| 2. Figures |
| 3. Supplemental Materials |
| Final Verification Checklist |
| 1. Ensure all sections are included and formatted according to the journal’s guidelines. |
| 2. Confirm consistency between methods, results, and supporting figures/tables. |
| 3. Proofread thoroughly for clarity, grammar, and adherence to the journal’s submission requirements. |
| By following this guide, you can ensure your manuscript is comprehensive, well-organized, and ready for submission. |
Printable curriculum checklist
Open the complete original DOCX
Research Fundamentals - Thriving in an Innovation Research Lab Unabridged Checklist
☐ Review lab mission, vision, projects
☐ Understand scientific method and lab roles
☐ Learn best practices and lab etiquette
☐ Develop critical thinking and creativity
☐ Practice collaborative teamwork
☐ Read assigned foundational articles
☐ Understand intellectual property basics
☐ Practice iterative research design
☐ Analyze and visualize research data
☐ Stay current with the literature
☐ Practice resilience in setbacks
☐ Build communication skills
☐ Read and apply the three assigned essays
☐ Use the manuscript readiness checklist
☐ Integrate into ongoing projects
Knowledge-check preparation
Open the complete original DOCX
Brown Virtual Lab Research Fundamentals Knowledge Check
Core Research Understanding
☐ Review Brown Virtual Lab research focus and expectations
☐ Understand key areas in cardio-oncology and digital health
☐ Review purpose and format of virtual collaboration
☐ Complete reading on translational research principles
☐ Understand structure and function of research teams
☐ Essential Research Tools
☐ Get access to and explore SharePoint or Google Drive folders
☐ Complete tutorial on using EndNote or Zotero
☐ Log into BioRender and create first figure
☐ Complete CITI certification or upload record of completion
☐ Understand BRANY IRB structure and functions
☐ Data and Analysis Skills
☐ Complete JMP or statistical software overview
☐ Understand purpose and use of genetic risk scores
☐ Explore Google Forms or REDCap demo study tools
☐ Review sample lab datasets and identify variables
☐ Research Communication and Integrity
☐ Review examples of successful abstracts and posters
☐ Understand formatting and citation styles
☐ Review guidelines for academic writing
☐ Understand rules of authorship and publication ethics
☐ Innovation and Vision
☐ Learn how the lab fosters innovation in research
☐ Understand how feedback loops work within lab structure
☐ Review examples of research impact and knowledge translation
